I did so to aid in distinguishing the general use of generative AI versus using generative AI specifically for therapeutic purposes. A client might be using generative AI in their daily lives for lots of non-therapy purposes. As long as that usage seemingly has no bearing on the therapy underway, there is no likely need to inform the therapist about the usage. The third instance TR-3 is when the AI is the client and the therapist is a human. I will explain why this AI-to-human therapeutic relationship might be beneficial. Generic generative AI is not devised to provide bona fide mental health guidance or advice.
Those in AI Ethics and AI Law are notably worried about this burgeoning trend of outstretched claims. You might politely say that some are insurance coverage clients prepared for generative ai? people are overstating what today’s AI can actually do. They assume that AI has capabilities that we haven’t yet been able to achieve.
All kinds of settings can be adjusted to make generative AI less alluring, more proactive about being selective and judicious with its usage, and seek to steer someone away from being addicted to generative AI. Per my extensive coverage of using generative AI for mental health, see the link here, one twist on the addiction to generative AI would be to use generative AI to aid in overcoming your addiction to generative AI. We could have a generative AI client that is training the human therapist. I realize this seems somewhat out of sorts since we would expect an AI therapist to be training a human therapist, assuming that the AI is doing any such training at all. I am willing to stretch this subtype to suggest that acting as a client, the AI could be subtly doing the work of an AI therapist that is simultaneously training a human therapist. Hopefully, that is a reasonable stretch of the subtype.
Each comes with a brief sentence or two as an explanation of the essence of the technique. I also provide a handy link for the full-on details, including examples. In terms of the naming or phrasing of each technique, there isn’t a standardized across-the-board accepted naming convention, thus I have used the name or phrases that I believe are most commonly utilized. The aim is to try invoking a generalized indication so that you’ll be immediately in the right ballpark of what the technique references. Third, I would vigorously suggest that learning about prompting has an added benefit that few seem to be acknowledging.
We have a client that is a human and a therapist that is a human. This goes back to perhaps the beginning of humankind. Anyway, we are in the Wild West days of generative AI and, of which, the domain of mental health therapy is assuredly in the same boot (aha, I could have said boat, but I opted instead for saying boot, funny maybe). The advent of generative AI on a large-scale basis being used in or amidst a mental health therapy situation is all around us and yet not being called out in any demonstrative way. One supposes that this will continue until regrettably something untoward gains sufficient prominence. A growing norm in the new era of generative AI is to disclose when AI has been used (such as how social-media companies have started tagging AI-produced content).
By and large, the professional relationship formed with and by the mental health therapist with their client or patient is paramount to the journey and outcome of mental health therapy. In today’s column, I will provide an analysis of how generative AI is gradually and likely inevitably becoming commingled into the revered client-therapist relationship. This is yet another addition to my ongoing series about the many ways that ChatGPT App generative AI is making an impact in mental health therapy guidance. You should also realize that ChatGPT is not the only generative AI app on the block. There are other generative AI apps that you can use. They too are likely cut from the same cloth, namely that the inputs you enter as prompts and the outputs you receive as generated outputted essays are considered part of the collective and can be used by the AI maker.
I will also mention one other facet that I realize will get some people boiling mad. Despite whatever the licensing stipulations are, you have to also assume that there is a possibility that those requirements might not be fully adhered to. In the end, sure, you might have a legal case against an AI maker for not conforming to their stipulations, but that’s somewhat after the horse is already out of the barn. Maybe use ChatGPT to write that memo that your boss has been haranguing you to write. All you need to do is provide a prompt with the bullet points that you have in mind, and the next thing you know an entire memo has been generated by ChatGPT that would make your boss proud of you. You copy the outputted essay from ChatGPT, paste it into the company’s official template in your word processing package, and email the classy memorandum to your manager.
The seventh bulleted point indicates that you are not to share any sensitive information in your conversations. I suppose you might quibble with what the definition of sensitive information consists of. Also, the bulleted point doesn’t tell you why you should not share any sensitive information. If you someday have to try and in a dire sweat explain why you foolishly entered confidential data, you might try the raised eyebrow claim that the warning was non-specific, therefore, you didn’t grasp the significance. I walked you through that process due to one common misconception that seems to be spreading around. Some people appear to believe that because your prompt text is being converted into numeric tokens, you are safe and sound that the internals of the AI app somehow no longer have your originally entered text.
Anyone using generic generative AI for that purpose is doing so without any semblance that the generative AI is shaped for mental health therapeutic uses. In a sense, you cannot necessarily blame them for falling into an easy trap, namely that the generic generative AI will usually readily engage in dialogues that certainly seem to be of a mental health nature. There are numerous generative AI apps available nowadays, including GPT-4, Bard, Gemini, Claude, ChatGPT, etc. The one that is seemingly the most popular would be ChatGPT by AI maker OpenAI. You can foun additiona information about ai customer service and artificial intelligence and NLP. In November 2022, OpenAI’s ChatGPT was made available to the public at large and the response was astounding in terms of how people rushed to make use of the newly released AI app. There are an estimated one hundred million active weekly users at this time.
It is a modestly token piece of advice worthy of being remembered. Hopefully, this gets you into a frame of mind on these matters and will remain on top of your mind. Note that the stipulation indicates that the provision applies to the use of the API ChatGPT as a means of connecting to and using the OpenAI models all told. It is somewhat murky as to whether this equally applies to end users that are directly using ChatGPT. Okay, so those are the obvious cautions as presented for all users to readily see.
Words and how they are composed can spell a spirited legal defense or a dismal legal calamity. Thank goodness that you used the generative AI app to scrutinize your precious written narrative. You undoubtedly would prefer that the AI finds those disquieting written issues rather than after sending the document to your prized client. Imagine that you had composed the narrative for someone that had hired you to devise a quite vital depiction. If you had given the original version to the client, before doing the AI app review, you might suffer grand embarrassment. The client would almost certainly harbor serious doubts about your skills to do the work that was requested.
The tool then proceeds to interact with the AI and seek to jailbreak it. Another thing to know about those bamboozlements is they customarily require carrying on a conversation with the generative AI. You need to step-by-step walk the AI down the primrose path. You provide a prompt and wait to see the response. You then enter another prompt and wait to see the next response.
The Future of Generative AI ( : 8 Predictions to Watch.
Posted: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 07:00:00 GMT [source]
Rather than doing an introspective examination that they opted to toss asunder prompt engineering, they will likely bemoan that generative AI is confusing, confounding, and ought to be avoided. In today’s column, I am continuing my ongoing coverage of prompt engineering strategies and tactics that aid in getting the most out of using generative AI apps such as ChatGPT, GPT-4, Bard, Gemini, Claude, etc. “The algorithms are able to capture the clients’ and advisors’ responses and interactions with these ideas and, in turn, work to improve the quality of these communications over time.” “We always have an issue with time. We always have an issue choosing the right technology. We have to experiment with channels to figure out what to use, and that takes time.”
For business owners, AI is a powerful tool for both decision-making and support, but Hardwick said companies need to set up “guardrails” to operate safely and ethically. In response to the challenges posed by generative AI, Matt Adamczyk, principal technical program manager at Microsoft, suggested people continue to be skeptical and thoughtful when consuming information online. However, not all businesses in Northeast Wisconsin share the same enthusiasm for adopting AI. I still opted to keep the below in alphabetical order.
The line between a machine and being a human begins to blur for them. If those criteria or characteristics match a person using generative AI, it seems feasible they might be addicted to generative AI. I submit to you that addiction to generative AI can be assessed using a similar set of characteristics.
Where the insured period is short, it is harder to calculate the risk (unless there are large numbers of policies that have been sold) and so again AI can help to ensure profitable business. AI tools can also help with the creation of personalised communications and personalised insurance offers. AI-powered insurance companies can offer policies that are tailored to the specific needs of individual customers, with policies automatically written to their precise specifications. Some people do these tricks for the sake of deriding generative AI. They hope to raise complex societal issues about what we want generative AI to do.
Also, the licensing differs from AI maker to AI maker, plus a given AI maker can opt to change their licensing so make sure to remain vigilant on whatever the latest version of the licensing stipulates. Indeed, that’s what prompt engineering is all about. The idea is to abide by tried-and-true prompting techniques, strategies, tactics, and the like, doing so to get the most you fruitfully can out of using generative AI. A whole gaggle of AI researchers have painstakingly sought to perform experiments and ascertain what kinds of prompts are useful.
Let’s move on to the next vital topic, namely the introduction of generative AI into the client-therapist relationship. Also, let’s focus on relationships of a 1-to-1 nature. The idea is that there are two participants in the relationship. Not all relationships have to be confined to just two participants. There could be relationships involving three, four, five, and any number of participants. In the discussion herein, I will concentrate on 1-to-1 relationships consisting of two participants.
The better an AI therapist can be, the more useful it will be (hopefully) for advising human clients. We could have a human therapist who is learning how to perform mental health therapy and they do so via “treating” a pretend client (the AI is acting as a persona that is seeking treatment, see my coverage at the link here). Some would vehemently insist that using an AI-based mental therapist bereft of a human therapist is a travesty and a grave danger. The client presumably is relying solely on whatever the generative AI has to say. One big concern is that the generative AI might tell the client to do things that are absolutely categorically wrong to provide therapeutic advice. The client might not realize they are getting foul advice.
© 2021 by iGaming Service
